Horizontal Remediation Well System system technology was challenged on an In Situ Chemical Oxidation (ISCO) project. The impacts encompassed the approximate size of a football field. The rough dimensions were 300 feet long and 160 feet wide with several underground utilities.

The main challenger was vertical injections with direct-push technology (DPT). The strengths and weaknesses of each technology were evaluated. Some of the highlights are as follows:

Table 1: Vertical Well System vs. Horizontal Remediation Well System

Horizontal Remediation Well System

At first, a Horizontal Remediation Well system has a zone of influence (ZOI) that resembles a cigar-shape. Then the Horizontal Remediation Well system’s ZOI will gradually expand outward and into an elliptical shape. A Horizontal Remediation Well system’s ZOI is typically many times greater than a vertical well system in the same formation. (See the image of a cross section perpendicular to horizontal well below)

Figure 1: Cross Section of Horizontal Well vs. Vertical Well with ZOI

Horizontal Well ZOI v. Vertical Well ZOIBesides creating over 150+ holes in the area resembling a football field, the DPT injection point layout would require offsets from underground utilities. More time would also be needed to hand clear 150+ DPT locations, whereas less time was necessary to hand clear 4 Horizontal Remediation Well  locations for utility clearances.  An option for a second ISCO event was also requested. This option required installation and abandonment of 150+ temporary points for DPT remedial approach. Whereas, the four (4) permanently installed horizontal wells were far more cost effective with little to no site restoration necessary.

Horizontal Remediation Well System

To summarize a winning strategy, a Horizontal Remediation Well system consistently outperforms a vertical well system. Horizontal Remediation Well technology provides an effective delivery method to reach previously inaccessible areas without disrupting the playing field.